The rating scoring (weight percent) by indicators and criteria with a total of 600 points (100%)
Indicator 1
A contingent of students is 100 points (as on October 1, 2016)
| Data |
Points |
|
| 1.1 |
The proportion of full-time students to the total number of students : (N full-time students / N full-time students+ part-time+ evening )x100% Maximum score will be given to the TVET organization with the largest proportion of full-time students. |
20 points |
| 1.2 |
The proportion of students studying by state scholarships to the total number of full-time students. (N full-time students by scholarships / N full-time students)x100% Maximum score will be given to the TVET organization with the largest proportion of students studying by state scholarships. |
30 points |
| 1.3 |
The proportion of out-of the town full-time students to the total number of full-time students: (N full-time out-of the town students / N full-time students)x100% The maximum score will be given to the TVET organization with the largest proportion of out-of-town students. |
10 points |
| 1.4 |
Provision of out-of-the town students with student accommodation: N accommodation / N full-time out-of the town students The maximum score is given to the TVET organization with the largest proportion of the area per one out-of-town student. |
20 points |
| 1.5 |
The scaling index of TVET organizations, where Р is the reduced contingent of college students, which is calculated by the formula Р= N full-time students . + N pert-time students х 0,25; Paverage - the average number of the reduced contingent of students per one TVET educational institution across the country, which is calculated by formula : Рaverage = the number of the reduced contingency of students across the country /total number of colleges |
20 points |
| 1 |
Total |
100 points |
Indicator 2
The results of the training of students and the number of study programmes implemented in the TVET organization - 100 points
| Data |
Points |
|
| 2.1 |
The ratio of the number of students to the number of study programmes (specialties) The maximum score will be given to the college with the highest ratio. |
50 points |
| 2.1.1 |
The ratio of the number of students enrolled at a fixed level (2), to the number of programmes at the established level. |
15 points |
| 2.1.2 |
The ratio of the number of students enrolled in the level of a specialist in the middle level (3), to the number of programmes for the level of a mid-level specialist. |
15 points |
| 2.1.3 |
The ratio of the number of students enrolled in post-secondary education to the number of post-secondary study programmes. |
20 points |
| 2.2 |
The proportion of students-winners of the WorldSkills Championship over the last three years, to the total number of college students. |
50 points |
| 2.2.1 |
The share of students-winners of the WorldSkills Kazakhstan championship for the last three years, to the total number of college students. |
20 points |
| 2.2.2 |
The proportion of students-winners of the WorldSkills International Championship for the last three years, to the total number of college students. |
30 points |
| 2 |
TOTAL |
100 points |
The level of professional competence of the engineering and pedagogical workers in the TVET organization is calculated on the basis of indicator 3
Indicator 3
Quality of engineering and pedagogical workers (EPW)- 150 points
| Data |
Points |
|
| 3.1 |
Proportion of doctors, candidates of sciences, PhD to the EPW staff: (Ndoct.+cand.+PhD / N EPW )x100% |
20 points |
| 3.2 |
The proportion of EPW with the highest qualification category to the total EPW staff : (N highest cat./ N EPW )x100% |
40 points |
| 3.3 |
The proportion of EPW with the first qualification category to the total EPW staff : (N first cat./ N EPW )x100% |
10 points |
| 3.4 |
The proportion of MSc from the staff number of the EPW: (N MasterSc/ N EPW )x100% |
30 points |
| 3.5 |
The proportion of EPW that have passed the qualification internship during more than 1 month / N EPW x100% |
20 points |
| 3.6 |
The proportion of textbooks, teaching aids published with the stamp of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan, per one full-time academic staff over the last three calendar years: N books/ N EPW x100% |
30 points |
| 3 |
TOTAL |
150 points |
Indicator 4
The quality of the TVET organization’s activities is 100 points
| Data |
Points |
|
| 4.1 |
The institutional accreditation certification by the TVET organization (submission of a link to the website of an accredited body that is part of the National Register of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan). |
60 points |
| 4.2 |
The proportion of accreditated educational programs (submission of a link to the site of an accredited body included in the National Register of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan) (Naccred.study programa/N total study programs )х 100%. |
40 points |
| 4 |
TOTAL |
100 points |
Indicator 5
Cooperation with enterprises - 150 points
| Data |
Points |
|
| 5.1 |
Proportion of advanced manufactures where students practice: (Number of advanced manufactures /average number of organizations where students practice across Kazakhstan per college) x100% (Advanced manufactures are the enterprises known in Kazakhstan) |
60 points |
| 5.2 |
The proportion of educational programs in which dual training is introduced: the number of programs with dual training / total number of educational programs. |
90 points |
| 5 |
TOTAL |
150 points |
In the context of global informatization, in order to promote the educational image of the TVET organization, it is necessary to pay special attention to the quality, completeness of the information offered on the websites of educational institutions on the Internet. The level of information provision is calculated by the 6th indicator and 10 criteria.
Indicator 6
Information support - 100 points
| Data |
points |
|
| 6.1 |
Content Is determined by the quality and number of materials displayed on the site. |
20 points |
| 6.2 |
The size of the website is determined by the number of web pages. |
20 points |
| 6.3 |
Availability of archives. |
5 points |
| 6.4 |
Site renewability. |
10 points |
| 6.5 |
Design and convenience in site navigation. |
5 points |
| 6.6 |
Presence of information about the management and employees of the educational institution (contact details: phone numbers, e-mail). |
5 points |
| 6.7 |
Presentation of the site in several languages (in the Kazakh, Russian and English languages, etc.). |
10 points |
| 6.8 |
Number of visits (presence of a visit counter). |
5 points |
| 6.9 |
Number of links to the site. |
10 points |
| 6.10 |
Information representation (number of references in the media) |
10 points |
| 6 |
TOTAL |
100 points |
